openclawclaude-codev1.0.0
Workflow Best Practices
@scarter4work⭐ 0 stars· last commit 4mo ago· 5 open issues
This skill provides context and examples for the enforced development workflow.
6.6/10
Verified
Mar 9, 2026// RATINGS
🟢ProSkills ScoreAI Verified
6.6/10📍
Not yet listed on ClawHub or SkillsMP
// README
# Workflow Compliance Enforcer MCP
[](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
[](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
> **Enforce client-mandated development workflows with audit trails, state persistence, and compliance reporting.**
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server designed for enterprise, government, and regulated industries where development workflows are **non-negotiable** and **compliance is critical**.
## Why This Exists
In enterprise consulting and government contracts, clients often mandate strict development workflows:
- ✅ Tests **must** pass before commit
- ✅ Code **must** be deployed before issue close
- ✅ Production **must** be verified
- ✅ Audit trail **must** exist for compliance
**This MCP server enforces those workflows** and provides proof of compliance.
## Features
### 🔒 Compliance-First
- **State Persistence** - Workflow survives Claude Code restarts
- **Audit Trails** - Automatic compliance reports with timestamps
- **Pre-flight Checks** - Validates required scripts before starting
- **Time Tracking** - Duration tracking for all steps
### 🎯 Workflow Management
- **Visual Progress** - Real-time workflow visualization
- **Multiple Templates** - Different workflows for different tasks
- **Resume Capability** - Pick up where you left off after crashes
- **Better Errors** - Actionable suggestions for common issues
### ⚙️ Configurable
- **Per-Project Config** - Different workflows for different projects
- **Deployment Methods** - Git-push, script-based, or manual
- **Verification Strategies** - Smoke test, script, manual, or none
- **Strict/Lenient Modes** - Enforce or warn
## Quick Start
### Installation
1. **Clone and build:**
```bash
git clone https://github.com/scarter4work/workflow-compliance-enforcer.git
cd workflow-compliance-enforcer
npm install
npm run build
```
2. **Add to Claude Code MCP config** (`~/.claude/mcp.json`):
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"workflow-enforcer": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/path/to/workflow-compliance-enforcer/build/index.js"]
}
}
}
```
3. **Restart Claude Code**
### Configuration
Create `.workflow-enforcer.json` in your project root:
```json
{
"mode": "strict",
"template": "full-deployment",
"test_command": "npm test",
"deploy_method": "git-push",
"production_verification": "script",
"production_test_command": "npm run test:prod"
}
```
## Usage
### Basic Workflow
```javascript
// 1. Start work on an issue
workflow_start_issue({ issue_number: 42 })
// 2. Write your code, then run tests
workflow_run_tests()
// 3. Commit (only works after tests pass)
workflow_commit({ message: "fix: resolve authentication bug" })
// 4. Deploy to production
workflow_deploy()
// 5. Verify production
workflow_verify_prod()
// 6. Close issue and generate audit report
workflow_close_issue()
```
### Resume After Crash
```javascript
// If Claude Code crashes mid-workflow
workflow_start_issue({ issue_number: 42, resume: true })
// Picks up exactly where you left off!
```
### Check Progress
```javascript
workflow_status({ detailed: true })
```
**Output:**
```
📊 Workflow Status:
State: TESTS_PASSED
Active Issue: #42 - Fix authentication bug
Commit: None
📋 Workflow Progress (full-deployment):
✅ 1. Start Issue (workflow_start_issue)
✅ 2. Run Tests (workflow_run_tests)
⏳ 3. Commit Changes (workflow_commit) ← YOU ARE HERE
⬜ 4. Deploy to Production (workflow_deploy)
⬜ 5. Verify Production (workflow_verify_prod)
⬜ 6. Close Issue (workflow_close_issue)
Available actions:
- workflow_commit
```
## Workflow Templates
### Full Deployment (default)
For production features requiring full release cycle:
1. Start Issue → 2. Run Tests → 3. Commit → 4. Deploy → 5. Verify → 6. Close
### Tests Only
For internal changes that don't need deployment:
1. Start Issue → 2. Run Tests → 3. Commit → 4. Close
### Docs Only
For documentation changes:
1. Start Issue → 2. Commit → 3. Close
## Audit Reports
Every completed workflow generates an audit report:
```
📊 Workflow Completion Report - Issue #42
======================================================================
Issue: Fix authentication bug
Started: 2025-11-16T12:00:00.000Z
Completed: 2025-11-16T12:45:30.000Z
Duration: 0h 45m 30s
Steps Completed:
✅ Start Issue - 2025-11-16T12:00:00.000Z
✅ Run Tests - 2025-11-16T12:15:00.000Z (12450ms)
✅ Commit Changes - 2025-11-16T12:20:00.000Z
✅ Deploy to Production - 2025-11-16T12:35:00.000Z (145000ms)
✅ Verify Production - 2025-11-16T12:43:00.000Z (8200ms)
✅ Close Issue - 2025-11-16T12:45:30.000Z
Commits:
- a1b2c3d: fix: resolve authentication bug
Attestation: All required workflow steps completed successfully.
Signed: workflow-enforcer v2.0.0
```
Saved to `.workflow/reports/issue-42-report.md` for compliance purposes.
## Configuration Options
| Option | Values | Description |
|--------|--------|-------------|
| `mode` | `strict`, `lenient` | Strict = enforced; Lenient = warnings |
| `template` | `full-deployment`, `tests-only`, `docs-only` | Workflow to use |
| `test_command` | string | Test command (default: `npm test`) |
| `deploy_method` | `git-push`, `script`, `manual` | How to deploy |
| `production_verification` | `smoke-test`, `script`, `manual`, `none` | How to verify |
See [WORKFLOW_ENFORCER_V2.md](./WORKFLOW_ENFORCER_V2.md) for complete documentation.
## Use Cases
### Enterprise Client
```json
{
"mode": "strict",
"template": "full-deployment",
"deploy_method": "manual",
"production_verification": "manual"
}
```
Manual gates for deployment and verification with full audit trail.
### CI/CD Automation
```json
{
"mode": "strict",
"template": "full-deployment",
"deploy_method": "git-push",
"production_verification": "smoke-test",
"production_url": "https://api.example.com/health"
}
```
Automated deployment with quick smoke test verification.
### Internal Development
```json
{
"mode": "lenient",
"template": "tests-only"
}
```
Skip deployment for internal changes, but still enforce tests.
## Available Tools
- `workflow_start_issue` - Begin work with pre-flight checks
- `workflow_run_tests` - Run test suite with duration tracking
- `workflow_commit` - Commit code (only after tests pass)
- `workflow_deploy` - Deploy to production
- `workflow_verify_prod` - Verify production deployment
- `workflow_close_issue` - Close issue and generate audit report
- `workflow_status` - Check current workflow state
- `workflow_config` - View/update configuration
## Requirements
- Node.js 18+
- GitHub CLI (`gh`) for issue management
- Claude Code with MCP support
## Comparison: v1.0 vs v2.0
| Feature | v1.0 | v2.0 |
|---------|------|------|
| State Persistence | ❌ | ✅ |
| Pre-flight Checks | ❌ | ✅ |
| Workflow Visualization | ❌ | ✅ |
| Audit Reports | ❌ | ✅ |
| Configuration | ❌ Hardcoded | ✅ Per-project |
| Templates | ❌ One size fits all | ✅ 3 templates |
| Error Messages | ⚠️ Generic | ✅ Actionable |
| Time Tracking | ❌ | ✅ |
| Resume Capability | ❌ | ✅ |
## Contributing
Contributions welcome! Please:
1. Fork the repository
2. Create a feature branch
3. Submit a pull request
For major changes, please open an issue first.
## License
MIT License - see [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for details.
## Support
- **Issues:** [GitHub Issues](https://github.com/scarter4work/workflow-compliance-enforcer/issues)
- **Documentation:** [Full Docs](./WORKFLOW_ENFORCER_V2.md)
- **MCP Docs:** [Model Context Protocol](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
## Acknowledgments
Built with [Model Context Protocol](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) by Anthropic.
---
**Built for compliance. Designed for real-world client workflows.**
// HOW IT'S BUILT
TECHNOLOGY STACK
TypeScript
Node.js
JavaScript
This skill is built with TypeScript, Node.js, JavaScript. The repo includes a Node.js package.
KEY FILES
INSTALL_SKILL.mdREADME.mdSKILL.mdWORKFLOW_SKILL.md
// REPO STATS
0 stars
5 open issues
Last commit: 4mo ago
// SHARE
// SOURCE
View on GitHub// PROSKILLS SCORE
6.6/10
Good
BREAKDOWN
Code Quality6/10
Documentation8/10
Functionality7/10
Maintenance6/10
Security4/10
Uniqueness7/10
Usefulness8/10