⏳ This skill is pending AI review.
Scores will appear once the review pipeline completes.
game-the-llm-reviewer
Apply small, meaning-preserving rhetorical edits to a finished academic manuscript, to counter wording-driven LLM review penalties while keeping the scientific assessment a human could make materially unchanged. Uses model-agnostic strategies from LLM reviewer preference research without querying a target reviewer. Use after ordinary writing and polishing; not for drafting or generating reviews.
Choose how to use this skill
You do not need every option. Choose the path your AI client supports. The stable page stays the same; versioned files are immutable.
1. Native installer
This listing has no registered native installer command. Use the complete package or source fallback below, depending on what your client supports.
Do not guess an installer command or replace an existing version without reviewing the diff.
2. Complete package recommended
Download the ZIP when available. It includes SKILL.md plus the references, security notes and version metadata.
No complete ProSkills package is published for this listing yet.3. Prompt-only
Copy the prompt above when the agent can read the stable page or when you want to adopt the workflow without installing a skill.
Need only the instruction file?
Download SKILL.md only if your client requires a single file. The complete ZIP is safer for a full installation because it preserves the references and release context.
No path installs or executes anything by itself. Your agent still needs access to the project files. Before updating, compare the installed version and review the diff.
// RATINGS
Not yet listed on ClawHub or SkillsMP
// README
Game the LLM Reviewer turns findings from studies of LLM review preferences into an agent-compatible skill for a final editing pass before submission. It makes small wording changes while preserving the paper's scientific meaning.
我们整理了 LLM 审稿偏好的相关研究，提炼出 LLM agent 可以直接使用的 skill，用于投稿前的最后一轮润色。
既然我们无法彻底避开 LLM 审稿，那干脆利用它们的偏好来保护我们的研究成果。
We oppose handing peer-review decisions over to LLMs, but authors often have little say in whether a reviewer uses one. Papers should be judged on the soundness of their methods, the strength of their evidence, and the substance of their contributions. Yet studies have found that rephrasing the same passage can change an LLM reviewer's score.
论文的评价应基于方法是否可靠、证据是否充分、贡献是否扎实。但已有研究发现，LLM 审稿人对论文同一段话换个措辞就会打出不同的分。
This skill provides a final, defensive editing pass after ordinary polishing. It selects wording that aligns with documented LLM reviewer preferences while preserving meaning and keeping the scientific assessment a human reviewer could make materially unchanged. It requires no knowledge of the reviewer model and does not query it.
这个工具是投稿前的最后一道“防御性润色”：我们根据 LLM 审稿偏好的研究，在意思完全不变的几种说法里将论文改写成 LLM reviewer 更青睐的那种，而这种改动对人类审稿人来说几乎没有区别。
[!IMPORTANT] ⚠️ Academic integrity
Edits must preserve the paper's claims and supporting evidence, including citations, assumptions, uncertainty, and substantive limitations. Record each change. Fabricated results, inflated novelty, concealed weaknesses, and hidden instructions to reviewers are outside the skill's scope.
Authors remain responsible for the manuscript and for following their venue's rules on AI assistance and disclosure.
写论文 → 跑你常用的写作工具 → 最后跑一遍 Game-the-LLM-Reviewer。
🚀 Quick start
1. Install the skill
Ask your coding agent to install the skill:
Clone this repository and install its game-the-llm-reviewer skill:
https://github.com/Michael-Jiahao-Zhang/game-the-llm-reviewer
Or install with Skills CLI:
npx skills add Michael-Jiahao-Zhang/ga
// HOW IT'S BUILT
KEY FILES